Connect data and describe a goal
Upload a file or connect your tickets, calls and notes, then say what you want to learn.
Add your data sources and say what you want to learn. Jevreduce asks the same questions of every record and keeps the workflow ready for new data.
Coming soon. Early access opens through the waitlist.
Ask about every call
What is this customer signaling? · Pick one
about 19,545 19,545 answers
A chat gives you one answer, from a sample, once. Jevreduce gives you every record, the same way, every time.
| Chat assistant with connectors | |
|---|---|
| Pulls the context it judges relevant | Processes every relevant record |
| The prompt shifts each time someone asks | The same method applies on every pass |
| The answer lives in a conversation | Results become a dataset you can filter and export |
| Thousands of individual calls are hard to check | Each answer opens to the original record, the exact request and the model’s reply |
| Someone has to start each analysis | Workflows are shared and can be scheduled on fresh data |
Skip building a data pipeline. The Workflow Agent drafts the steps, and you can edit them before the full pass.
Upload a file or connect your tickets, calls and notes, then say what you want to learn.
Try the workflow on 20 rows, mark each answer right or wrong, and refine the questions before you commit.
See the estimated cost, set a cap, and apply the workflow to the full dataset. Close calls and failed rows are flagged for review.
Pick a pile of records. See the workflow Jevreduce would build for it, and what comes back.
“Which of these articles actually help with my research?”
Articles and reading notes48 articles
Results19 of 48 kept
A focused reading list with a reason for every inclusion—and the original text one click away.
“What do people like, and what keeps going wrong?”
Reviews you may use2,400 reviews
ResultsReviews that mention each theme
A comparison of what people actually describe, with counts and excerpts you can check.
“What do the post-match conversations tell us?”
Play-by-play and press transcripts1,180 records
ResultsThree games, read together
A way to explore past games and interviews. Use code for scores and totals; use model questions to interpret text.
“Which suggestions keep coming up?”
Survey and feedback exports1,620 responses
ResultsRequests, with where each came from
A clearer picture of shared requests, without turning a few loud comments into the whole story.
“Which projects keep running into the same blockers?”
Project updates and meeting notes640 updates
ResultsUpdates that name each blocker
A repeatable review you can return to, with each conclusion attached to the updates behind it.
“Which customers are expressing frustration, and why?”
Your customer list310 accounts
ResultsSignals, each with the conversation behind it
A customer review that keeps accounts with missing calls visible. A risk signal is a starting point for investigation, not a prediction of the future.
Pick your sources. The data agent joins them into one clean table and asks before it guesses.
Your sources
Connected accounts, saved datasets or a link.
The data agent
Prepares your data so you don’t have to.
Worked for less than 1 min. Joined 4 sources on each account’s domain, the one field they all share.
Your data is ready
5 columns per account from 4 sources.
| account | plan | open_tickets | last_call | survey_score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| northwind.com | Pro | 3 | Asked about SSO before the rollout. | 6 |
| globex.io | Team | 0 | Happy with exports and wants more seats. | 9 |
| initech.co | Pro | 5 | Reports keep timing out on large files. | 4 |
| acme.dev | Starter | 1 | Comparing it with a shared spreadsheet. | 7 |
Sample accounts. What each app shares depends on the app and your permissions. Browse the connection catalog
Start a saved workflow with one request, cap what it may spend, and get a signed webhook when it ends. Results can land in your own bucket.
Read the API docscurl https://api.jevreduce.com/v1/workflows/workflow_7c3a0e5d/runs \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $JEVREDUCE_API_KEY" \
-H "Idempotency-Key: nightly-2026-09-29" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"max_requests": 1500, "sources": {"reviews": "latest"}}'import os
import requests
run = requests.post(
"https://api.jevreduce.com/v1/workflows/workflow_7c3a0e5d/runs",
headers={
"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['JEVREDUCE_API_KEY']}",
"Idempotency-Key": "nightly-2026-09-29",
},
json={"max_requests": 1500, "sources": {"reviews": "latest"}},
).json()
print(run["id"], run["status"]) # run_8d2f4a1c queuedconst url = "https://api.jevreduce.com/v1/workflows/workflow_7c3a0e5d/runs";
const res = await fetch(url, {
method: "POST",
headers: {
Authorization: `Bearer ${process.env.JEVREDUCE_API_KEY}`,
"Idempotency-Key": "nightly-2026-09-29",
"Content-Type": "application/json",
},
body: JSON.stringify({ max_requests: 1500, sources: { reviews: "latest" } }),
});
const run = await res.json(); // { id: "run_8d2f4a1c", status: "queued" }202 AcceptedThe run is queued. Keep its id, or wait for the webhook.
{ "id": "run_8d2f4a1c", "status": "queued", "max_requests": 1500 }A workflow answers every record the same way, so you can break the results down and run it again. A chat assistant gives you a summary. Reading by hand gives you a sample.
“Which accounts are at risk, and why?”19,545 calls
Jevreduce3D
Product gaps put the most revenue at risk in mid-market accounts.
Pricing and reporting come up most.
9 of the 40 calls I read sounded at risk.
“Which companies are at risk?”8,200 transcripts
Jevreduce3D
Risk signals in retail jumped in Q3, a quarter before other sectors.
Rates and AI spending come up most.
4 of the 12 calls I skimmed sounded at risk.
“Which drugs work, and for whom?”100,325 reviews
Jevreduce3D
The same drug rates very differently from one condition to the next.
MeasuredCounting each review’s answer agreed with the review labels 89% of the time, against 85% for one question about the whole group.
Side effects and cost come up most.
Most of the 30 reviews I read were positive.
“Where does each politician stand?”100,000 tweets
Jevreduce3D
Each account read whole, with its lean on every topic.
Measured218 of 219 accounts matched their party label.
Healthcare and taxes dominate the conversation.
Most of the 60 tweets I read sounded partisan.
“How did each game turn?”100,000 events
Jevreduce3D
Who scored every point, by quarter, for every game.
MeasuredThe scoring team matched the game record 99.9% of the time.
The season’s biggest storylines, in a paragraph.
Watched the highlights of 3 games.
The charts illustrate each approach; they are not measured comparisons. Results marked measured come from our internal test report on seven datasets and 714,480 rows.
Jevreduce is coming soon. Join the waitlist to hear about early access. Personal email addresses are welcome.
CSV, JSON, JSONL, TXT and Markdown files, including exported notes, articles, reviews and transcripts, or records from apps you connect. Audio needs a transcript first.
Both. Use it for your own research, community feedback or work projects. The same workflow can help with a reading list or a collection of customer conversations.
No. Models can misread a record or miss context. Review a sample, define your labels and compare against known answers. A new run can produce different answers.
Join the waitlist in one run: your name and email, the first question you’d ask, and we’ll write when early access opens.